Paper detail

Dense Molecular Gas Excitation in Nuclear Starbursts at High Redshift: HCN, HNC, and HCO+(J=6-5) Emission in the z=3.91 Quasar Host of APM08279+5255

We report the detection of surprisingly strong HCN, HNC, and HCO+(J=6-5) emission in the host galaxy of the z=3.91 quasar APM08279+5255 through observations with CARMA. HCN, HNC, and HCO+ are typically used as star formation indicators, tracing dense molecular hydrogen gas [n(H2) > 10^5,cm^-3] within star-forming molecular clouds. However, the strength of their respective line emission in the J=6-5 transitions in APM08279+5255 is extremely high, suggesting that they are excited by another mechanism besides collisions in the dense molecular gas phase alone. We derive J=6-5 line luminosities of L'(HCN)=(4.9+/-0.6), L'(HNC)=(2.4+/-0.7), and L'(HCO+)=(3.0+/-0.6)x10^10 (mu_L)^-1 K km/s pc^2 (where mu_L is the lensing magnification factor), corresponding to L' ratios of ~0.23-0.46 relative to CO(J=1-0). Such high line ratios would be unusual even in the respective ground-state (J=1-0) transitions, and indicate exceptional, collisionally and radiatively driven excitation conditions in the dense, star-forming molecular gas in APM08279+5255. Through an expansion of our previous modeling of the HCN line excitation in this source, we show that the high rotational line fluxes are caused by substantial infrared pumping at moderate opacities in a ~220K warm gas and dust component. This implies that standard M_dense/L' conversion factors would substantially overpredict the dense molecular gas mass M_dense. We also find a HCN J=6-5/5-4 L' ratio greater than 1 (1.36+/-0.31) - however, our models show that the excitation is likely not `super-thermal', but that the high line ratio is due to a rising optical depth between both transitions. These findings are consistent with the picture that the bulk of the gas and dust in this source is situated in a compact, nuclear starburst, where both the highly active galactic nucleus and star formation contribute to the heating.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.