Paper detail

Dense lattices in low dimensions

The Barnes-Wall lattice ${\bf Λ}_{16}$ with the center density ${\{1}{16}}$ and the kissing number 4320 was found in 1959 and is the only known densest sphere packing in the dimension 16. J. H. Conway and N.J.A. Sloane conjectured that ${\bf Λ}_{16}$ is the densest 16 dimensional lattice. Sometimes it is conjectured that the Barnes-Wall lattice ${\bf Λ}_{16}$ is the only densest lattice and the optimal sphere packing in ${\bf R}^{16}$. In this paper two new 16 dimensional lattices with the center density $\{1}{16}$ and the kissing numbers 4224 and 4176 are constructed. This leads to several new 14 and 15 dimensional lattices which have the same center densities but different kissing numbers as the presently known densest lattices in these two dimensions. This gives a negative answer to the long time expectation that ${\bf Λ}_n$'s, $n \leq 24, n \neq 11,12,13$ are the only densest lattices in their dimensions. {abstract}

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.