Paper detail

Dense gas tracing the collisional past of Andromeda. An atypical inner region?

The central kiloparsec region of the Andromeda galaxy is relatively gas poor, while the interstellar medium appears to be concentrated in a ring-like structure at about 10 kpc radius. The central gas depletion has been attributed to a possible head-on collision 200 Myr ago, supported by the existence of an offset inner ring of warm dust. We present new IRAM 30m radio telescope observations of the molecular gas in the central region, and the detection of CO and its isotopes $^{13}$CO(2-1) and C$^{18}$O(2-1), together with the dense gas tracers, HCN(1-0) and HCO+(1-0). A systematic study of the observed peak temperatures with non-LTE equilibrium simulations shows that the detected lines trace dense regions with n$_{H_2}$ in the range 2.5 $10^4 - 5.6 10^5$ cm$^{-3}$, while the gas is very clumpy with a beam filling factor of 0.5-2 10$^{-2}$. This is compatible with the dust mass derived from the far-infrared emission, assuming a dust-to-gas mass ratio of 0.01 with a typical clump size of 2 pc. We also show that the gas is optically thin in all lines except for $^{12}$CO(1-0) and $^{12}$CO(2-1), CO lines are close to their thermal equilibrium condition at 17.5-20 K, the molecular hydrogen density is larger than critical and HCN and HCO+ lines have a subthermal excitation temperature of 9 K with a density smaller than critical. The average $^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO line ratio is high (~21), and close to the $^{12}$CO/C$^{18}$O ratio (~30) that was measured in the north-western region and estimated in the south-east stacking. The fact that the optically thin $^{13}$CO and C$^{18}$O lines have comparable intensities means that the secondary element $^{13}$C is depleted with respect to the primary $^{12}$C, as is expected just after a recent star formation. This suggests that there has been a recent starburst in the central region, supporting the head-on collision scenario.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.