Paper detail

Dense CNN Learning with Equivalent Mappings

Large receptive field and dense prediction are both important for achieving high accuracy in pixel labeling tasks such as semantic segmentation. These two properties, however, contradict with each other. A pooling layer (with stride 2) quadruples the receptive field size but reduces the number of predictions to 25\%. Some existing methods lead to dense predictions using computations that are not equivalent to the original model. In this paper, we propose the equivalent convolution (eConv) and equivalent pooling (ePool) layers, leading to predictions that are both dense and equivalent to the baseline CNN model. Dense prediction models learned using eConv and ePool can transfer the baseline CNN's parameters as a starting point, and can inverse transfer the learned parameters in a dense model back to the original one, which has both fast testing speed and high accuracy. The proposed eConv and ePool layers have achieved higher accuracy than baseline CNN in various tasks, including semantic segmentation, object localization, image categorization and apparent age estimation, not only in those tasks requiring dense pixel labeling.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.