Paper detail

Democritus and the motive power of fire

The present work is a translation from french to english of our previous \g{Démocrite et la puissance motrice du feu}, amended on a number of respects. It is mainly of historical and pedagogical interest. We suggest that the concepts introduced in the ancien Greece by Anaximander (flat earth) and Democritus (corpuscles moving in vacuum) allow us to obtain through qualitative observations and plausible generalizations the maximum efficiency and work of heat engines, results that were firmly established around 1824 by Carnot. A prologue introduces the subject. We next present the concept of thermal equilibrium and consider a model consisting of two reservoirs located at different altitudes, each with $g$ sites. Each site may contain a specified number of corpuscles. One particular site plays the role of \g{working agent}. We subsequently consider an alternative model consisting of independent corpuscles submitted to gravity and in contact with heat baths. Only average quantities are considered, leaving out fluctuations and questions of stability.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.