Paper detail

Delving into the Imbalance of Positive Proposals in Two-stage Object Detection

Imbalance issue is a major yet unsolved bottleneck for the current object detection models. In this work, we observe two crucial yet never discussed imbalance issues. The first imbalance lies in the large number of low-quality RPN proposals, which makes the R-CNN module (i.e., post-classification layers) become highly biased towards the negative proposals in the early training stage. The second imbalance stems from the unbalanced ground-truth numbers across different testing images, resulting in the imbalance of the number of potentially existing positive proposals in testing phase. To tackle these two imbalance issues, we incorporates two innovations into Faster R-CNN: 1) an R-CNN Gradient Annealing (RGA) strategy to enhance the impact of positive proposals in the early training stage. 2) a set of Parallel R-CNN Modules (PRM) with different positive/negative sampling ratios during training on one same backbone. Our RGA and PRM can totally bring 2.0% improvements on AP on COCO minival. Experiments on CrowdHuman further validates the effectiveness of our innovations across various kinds of object detection tasks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.