Paper detail

Delayed Logistic and Rosenzweig - MacArthur Models with Allometric Parameter Setting Estimate Population Cycles Well

Context. So far, theoretical explanations for body-size patterns in periodic population dynamics have received little attention. In particular, tuning and testing of allometric models on empirical data and regressions has not been carried out yet. Here, oscillations expected from a one-species (delayed logistic) and a two-species (Rosenzweig-MacArthur) model were compared to cycles observed in laboratory experiments and field surveys for a wide range of invertebrates and vertebrates. The parameters in the equations were linked to body mass, using a consistent set of allometric relationships that was calibrated on 230 regressions. Oscillation period and amplitude predicted by the models were validated with data taken from literature. Results. The collected data showed that cycle times of herbivores scaled to species body mass with a slope up to 1/4 as expected from the models. With exception of aquatic herbi-detritivores, intercepts were observed at the level calculated by the two-species model. Remarkably, oscillation periods were size-independent for predatory invertebrates, fishes, birds and mammals. Average cycles were of 4 to 5 years, similar to those predicted by the one-species model with a size-independent delay of 1 year. The consistent difference between herbivores and the carnivores could be explained by the models from the small parameter space for consumer-resource cycles in generalist predators. As expected, amplitudes recorded in the field did not scale to size. Observed oscillation periods were generally within a factor of about 2 from the values expected from the models. This demonstrates that a set of slopes and intercepts for age and density parameters applicable to a wide range of species allows a reasonable estimate of independently measured cycle times.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.