Paper detail

Delay Estimation and Fast Iterative Scheduling Policies for LTE Uplink

We consider the allocation of spectral and power resources to the mobiles (i.e., user equipment (UE)) in a cell every subframe (1 ms) for the Long Term Evolution (LTE) orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) cellular network. To enable scheduling based on packet delays, we design a novel mechanism for inferring the packet delays approximately from the buffer status reports (BSR) transmitted by the UEs; the BSR reports only contain queue length information. We then consider a constrained optimization problem with a concave objective function - schedulers such as those based on utility maximization, maximum weight scheduling, and recent results on iterative scheduling for small queue/delay follow as special cases. In particular, the construction of the non-differentiable objective function based on packet delays is novel. We model constraints on bandwidth, peak transmit power at the UE, and the transmit power spectral density (PSD) at the UE due to fractional power control. When frequency diversity doesn't exist or is not exploited at a fast time-scale, we use subgradient analysis to construct an O(N log L) (per iteration with small number of iterations) algorithm to compute the optimal resource allocation for N users and L points of non-differentiability in the objective function. For a frequency diversity scheduler with M sub-bands, the corre- sponding complexity per iteration is essentially O(N(M^2+L^2)). Unlike previous iterative policies based on delay/queue, in our approach the complexity of scheduling can be reduced when the coherence bandwidth is larger. Through detailed system simulations (based on NGMN and 3GPP evaluation methodology) which model H-ARQ, finite resource grants per sub-frame, deployment, realistic traffic, power limitations, interference, and channel fading, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our schemes for LTE.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.