Paper detail

Degeneracy between mass and peculiar acceleration for the double white dwarfs in the LISA band

Mass and distance are fundamental quantities to measure in gravitational-wave (GW) astronomy. However, recent studies suggest that the measurement may be biased due to the acceleration of GW source. Here we develop an analytical method to quantify such a bias induced by a tertiary on a double white dwarf (DWD), since DWDs are the most common GW sources in the milli-Hertz band. We show that in a large parameter space the mass is degenerate with the peculiar acceleration, so that from the waveform we can only retrieve a mass of ${\cal M}(1+Γ)^{3/5}$, where ${\cal M}$ is the real chirp mass of the DWD and $Γ$ is a dimensionless factor proportional to the peculiar acceleration. Based on our analytical method, we conduct mock observation of DWDs by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). We find that in about $9\%$ of the cases the measured chirp mass is biased due to the presence of a tertiary by $(5-30)\%$. Even more extreme cases are found in about a dozen DWDs and they may be misclassified as double neutron stars, binary black holes, DWDs undergoing mass transfer, or even binaries containing lower-mass-gap objects and primordial black holes. The bias in mass also affects the measurement of distance, resulting in a seemingly over-density of DWDs within a heliocentric distance of $1$ kpc as well as beyond $100$ kpc. Our result highlights the necessity of modeling the astrophysical environments of GW sources to retrieve their correct physical parameters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.