Deformations of Fuchsian AdS representations are Quasi-Fuchsian

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let ΓΓ be a finitely generated group, and let $\op{Rep}(Γ, \SO(2,n))$ be the moduli space of representations of ΓΓ into $\SO(2,n)$ (n≥2n \geq 2). An element $ρ: Γ\to \SO(2,n)$ of $\op{Rep}(Γ, \SO(2,n))$ is \textit{quasi-Fuchsian} if it is faithful, discrete, preserves an acausal subset in the conformal boundary $\Ein_n$ of the anti-de Sitter space; and if the associated globally hyperbolic anti-de Sitter space is spatially compact - a particular case is the case of \textit{Fuchsian representations}, i.e. composition of a faithfull, discrete and cocompact representation $ρ_f: Γ\to \SO(1,n)$ and the inclusion $\SO(1,n) \subset \SO(2,n)$. In \cite{merigot} we proved that quasi-Fuchsian representations are precisely representations which are Anosov as defined in \cite{labourie}. In the present paper, we prove that quasi-Fuchsian representations form a connected component of $\op{Rep}(Γ, \SO(2,n))$. This is an almost direct corollary of the following result: let ΓΓ be the fundamental group of a globally hyperbolic spacetime locally modeled on $\AdS_n$, and let $ρ: Γ\to \SO_0(2,n)$ be the holonomy representation. Then, if ΓΓ is Gromov hyperbolic, the ρ(Γ)ρ(Γ)-invariant achronal limit set in $\Ein_n$ is acausal.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.