Paper detail

Deformation Expression for Elements of Algebras (VII) --Vacuum/Pseudo-vacuum Representations--

Thinking back the long history of physics, we see that the calculation used by physicists was nothing but the ordinary calculus. Another word, physicists have never wrote theories beyond the basic axioms of the calculus. This is not to declare of the victory of calculus or algebraic topology. On the contrary, we are thinking that every theory of mathematical physics must suggest new frontier of ordinary calculus, which are never viewed by classical geometers. Weyl algebras or Heisenberg algebras are naturally involved in slightly extended systems of the algebra of ordinary calculus, and are supported by the classical notion of phase spaces on which the general mechanics are based. The theory of deformation quantizations gives a notion of quantization of "phase space". To explain its essence in brief we proposed in the previous note the notion of $μ$-regulated algebra. In this series, we have introduced elements, called "vacuums" to consider the state vectors and the configuration spaces within the world of extended algebra of calculus with various expressions. We have found several strange elements, called polar elements, and an extended notions of vacuums, which were called pseudo-vacuums in our paper. These are not established notions in mathematical physics, but we are thinking that these must propose new frontier for mathematical physics. We are thinking that vacuums and pseudo-vacuums are not unique, but the function algebra of the configuration spaces must be an algebra similar to the Frobenius algebra defined by vacuums. The point in this note is that to obtain classical pictures one has often to restrict the expression parameters, and there are two essentially different expression parameters.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.