Paper detail

Defining Contact at the Atomic Scale

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to study different definitions of contact at the atomic scale. The roles of temperature, adhesive interactions and atomic structure are studied for simple geometries. An elastic, crystalline substrate contacts a rigid, atomically flat surface or a spherical tip. The rigid surface is formed from a commensurate or incommensurate crystal or an amorphous solid. Spherical tips are made by bending crystalline planes or removing material outside a sphere. In continuum theory the fraction of atomically flat surfaces that is in contact rises sharply from zero to unity when a load is applied. This simple behavior is surprisingly difficult to reproduce with atomic scale definitions of contact. Due to thermal fluctuations, the number of atoms making contact at any instant rises linearly with load over a wide range of loads. Pressures comparable to the ideal hardness are needed to achieve full contact at typical temperatures. A simple harmonic mean-field theory provides a quantitative description of this behavior and explains why the instantaneous forces on atoms have a universal exponential form. Contact areas are also obtained by counting the number of atoms with a time-averaged repulsive force. For adhesive interactions, the resulting area is nearly independent of temperature and averaging interval, but usually rises from zero to unity over a range of pressures that is comparable to the ideal hardness. The only exception is the case of two identical commensurate surfaces. For nonadhesive surfaces, the mean pressure is repulsive if there is any contact during the averaging interval $Δt$. The associated area is very sensitive to $Δt$ and grows monotonically. Similar complications are encountered in defining contact areas for spherical tips.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.