Paper detail

Definability in the substructure ordering of finite directed graphs

We deal with first-order definability in the substructure ordering $(\mathcal{D}; \sqsubseteq)$ of finite directed graphs. In two papers, the author has already investigated the first-order language of the embeddability ordering $( \mathcal{D}; \leq)$. The latter has turned out to be quite strong, e.g., it has been shown that, modulo edge-reversing (on the whole graphs), it can express the full second-order language of directed graphs. Now we show that, with finitely many directed graphs added as constants, the first order language of $( \mathcal{D}; \sqsubseteq)$ can express that of $( \mathcal{D}; \leq)$. The limits of the expressive power of such languages are intimately related to the automorphism groups of the orderings. Previously, analogue investigations have found the concerning automorphism groups to be quite trivial, e.g., the automorphism group of $( \mathcal{D}; \leq)$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_2$. Here, unprecedentedly, this is not the case. Even though we conjecture that the automorphism group is isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}_2^4 \times S_4)\rtimes_α \mathbb{Z}_2$, with a particular $α$ in the semidirect product, we only prove it is finite.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.