Paper detail

Deficit Round-Robin-Based ISP Traffic Control Scheme Enabling Excess Bandwidth Allocation in Shared Access Networks

In shared access shaping subscriber traffic based on token bucket by ISPs wastes network resources when there are few active subscribers, because it cannot allocate excess bandwidth in the long term. To address it, traffic control schemes based on core-stateless fair queueing (CSFQ) and token bucket meters (TBMs) have been proposed, which can allocate excess bandwidth among active subscribers proportional to their token generation rates. Using FIFO queue for all packets, however, degrades the short-term performance of conformant traffic due to the presence of non-conformant packets already in the queue. Also, the rate estimation based on exponential averaging makes it difficult to react to rapid changes in traffic conditions. In this paper we propose a new traffic control scheme based on deficit round-robin (DRR) and TBMs to guarantee the quality of service of conformant packets in all time scales while allocating excess bandwidth among active subscribers proportional to their token generation rates, whose advantages over the CSFQ-based schemes are demonstrated through simulation results.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.