Paper detail

Defensive Design of Saturating Counters Based on Differential Privacy

The saturating counter is the basic module of the dynamic branch predictor, which involves the core technique to improve instruction level parallelism performance in modern processors. However, most studies focus on the performance improvement and hardware consumption of saturating counters, while ignoring the security problems they may cause. In this paper, we creatively propose to study and design saturating counters from the defense perspective of differential privacy, so that attackers cannot distinguish the states that saturating counters are in and further infer sensitive information. To obtain theoretical guarantees, we use Markov chain to formalize the attack algorithm applied to the saturating counter, investigate into the optimal attack strategy and calculate the probability of successful attack. Furthermore, we find that the attacker is able to accurately guess the branch execution of the victim's process in the existing saturating counters. To avoid this, we design a new probabilistic saturating counter, which generalizes the existing conventional and probabilistic saturating counters. The guarantee of differential privacy is applied to deduce parameters of the new saturating counters so that the security requirement can be satisfied. We also theoretically calculate the misprediction rate when the saturating counter reaches the steady state. The experimental results on testing programs show that the calculated theoretical results agree with the experimental performances. Compared with the existing conventional and probabilistic saturating counters, when the parameters of our designed models are selected appropriately, the new saturating counters can not only ensure similar operational performance, but also establish strict security guarantee.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.