Paper detail

Defending from adversarial examples with a two-stream architecture

In recent years, deep learning has shown impressive performance on many tasks. However, recent researches showed that deep learning systems are vulnerable to small, specially crafted perturbations that are imperceptible to humans. Images with such perturbations are the so called adversarial examples, which have proven to be an indisputable threat to the DNN based applications. The lack of better understanding of the DNNs has prevented the development of efficient defenses against adversarial examples. In this paper, we propose a two-stream architecture to protect CNN from attacking by adversarial examples. Our model draws on the idea of "two-stream" which commonly used in the security field, and successfully defends different kinds of attack methods by the differences of "high-resolution" and "low-resolution" networks in feature extraction. We provide a reasonable interpretation on why our two-stream architecture is difficult to defeat, and show experimentally that our method is hard to defeat with state-of-the-art attacks. We demonstrate that our two-stream architecture is robust to adversarial examples built by currently known attacking algorithms.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.