Paper detail

Defects in quasicrystals, revisited II- perfect and imperfect dislocations

In this paper, the second part of a survey of the geometric properties of defects in quasicrystals studied from the Volterra viewpoint (see ref. [1]), we show that: 1$- $ a {\sf disvection line} L$_{||} \subset \mathrm E_{||}$ of Burgers vector $\textbf b =\textbf b_{||}+\textbf b_\bot $ splits naturally along L$_{||}$ into a {\sf perfect dislocation} of Burgers vector $\textbf b_{||}$ and an {\sf imperfect dislocation} of Burgers vector related to $\textbf b_{\bot}$, akin to a stacking fault, (a 'phason' defect), 2$- $ the 'phason' defects are classified according to the relative position of $Σ_{\bot}$ with respect to a partition of the acceptance window AW which depends on the direction of $\textbf b_\bot $. The perpendicular cut surface $Σ_{\bot}\subset \mathrm {AW}$ here introduced is a mapping of the usual cut surface $Σ_{||}\subset\mathrm E_{||}$. Imperfect dislocations in QCs are somewhat similar to Kronberg's synchroshear dislocations. It is also shown that climb must generically be easier than glide.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.