Paper detail

Defects-driven magnetism in bulk $α$-Li$ _{3}$N

\textit{Ab-initio} calculations based on density functional theory with local spin density approximation are used to study defects-driven magnetism in bulk $α$-Li$ _{3}$N. Our calculations show that bulk Li$ _{3} $N is a non-magnetic semiconductor. Two types of Li vacancies (Li-I and Li-II) are considered, and Li-vacancies (either Li-I or Li-II type) can induce magnetism in Li$ _{3}$N with a total magnetic moment of 1.0 $μ_{\rm B}$ which arises mainly due to partially occupied N-$p$-orbitals around the Li vacancies. The defect formation energies dictate that Li-II vacancy, which is in the Li$ _{2}$N plane, is thermodynamically more stable as compared with Li-I vacancy. The electronic structures of Li-vacancies show half-metallic behavior. On the other hand N-vacancy does not induce magnetism and has a larger formation energy than Li-vacancies. N vacancy derived bands at the Fermi energy are mainly contributed by the Li atoms. Carbon is also doped at Li-I and Li-II sites, and it is expected that doping C at Li-I site is thermodynamically more stable as compared with Li-II site. Carbon can induce metallicity with zero magnetic moment when doped at Li-I site, whereas magnetism is observed when Li-II site is occupied by the C impurity atom and C-driven magnetism is spread over the N atoms as well. Carbon can also induce half-metallic magnetism when doped at N site in Li$ _{3}$N, and has a smaller defect formation energy as compared with Li-II site doping. The ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) coupling between the C atoms is also investigated, and we conclude that FM state is more stable than the AFM state.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.