Paper detail

Defect Theory of Positronium and Nontrivial QED Relations

An effective theory of the excited states of positronium is derived and some of its consequences are explored. At large physical separation, the binding of the electron and positron is assumed to be described completely by QED, whereas all short-ranged phenomena, including those within and beyond QED, can be accounted for with energy-dependent quantum defects. This theory has at least two practical applications. First, it provides an accurate and economical, yet largely QED-independent, means to fit the positronium spectrum in order to predict and compare the outcome of experiments. Second, matching the spectrum in this effective theory to that predicted by QED reveals nontrivial relationships that exist \emph{within} bound-state QED; some higher order contributions to the spectrum may be obtained from lower order contributions. These relations are verified up to order $mα^{6}$, and predictions are made for the order $mα^{7}$ and $mα^{8}$ corrections. This theory and its extensions to other hydrogenic systems may provide a useful complement to bound-state QED.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.