Paper detail

Defect and Temperature Dependence of Tunneling in InAs/GaSb Heterojunctions

Tunnel field effect transistors (TFETs) utilizing semiconductor heterojunctions have shown promise for low energy logic but presently do not display subthreshold swings steeper than the room-temperature thermal limit of 60 mV/decade. These devices also show a pronounced temperature dependence that is not characteristic of a tunneling process. Herein, we explore these aspects by studying the temperature dependence of two-terminal InAs/GaSb heterojunctions, allowing for the true nature of tunneling at the interface to be seen without convolution from other three-terminal parasitic effects such as gate oxide traps. We compare the temperature dependence of peak current, excess current, and conductance slope for InAs/GaSb interfaces with and without interface defects. We identify that the tunnel and excess currents depend on temperature and defect density and propose that the ultimate leakage current in TFETs based on these materials will be affected by defects and inhomogeneity at the interface. We determine that the conductance slope, a two-terminal analog to subthreshold slope, does not depend on temperature, contrasting sharply with the heavy temperature dependence seen in three terminal devices in literature. We propose that TFETs based on this and similar materials systems are dominated by parasitic effects such as tunneling into oxide trap states, or other parasitics that are not intrinsic to the heterojunction itself, and that in the absence of these effects, the true steepness from band-to-band tunneling is limited by defects and inhomogeneity at the interface.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.