Paper detail

Deep Teams: Decentralized Decision Making with Finite and Infinite Number of Agents

Inspired by the concepts of deep learning in artificial intelligence and fairness in behavioural economics, we introduce deep teams in this paper. In such systems, agents are partitioned into a few sub-populations so that the dynamics and cost of agents in each sub-population is invariant to the indexing of agents. The goal of agents is to minimize a common cost function in such a manner that the agents in each sub-population are not discriminated or privileged by the way they are indexed. Two non-classical information structures are studied. In the first one, each agent observes its local state as well as the empirical distribution of the states of agents in each sub-population, called deep state, whereas in the second one, the deep states of a subset (possibly all) of sub-populations are not observed. Novel dynamic programs are developed to identify globally optimal and sub-optimal solutions for the first and second information structures, respectively. The computational complexity of finding the optimal solution in both space and time is polynomial (rather than exponential) with respect to the number of agents in each sub-population and is linear (rather than exponential) with respect to the control horizon. This complexity is further reduced in time by introducing a forward equation, that we call deep Chapman-Kolmogorov equation, described by multiple convolutional layers of Binomial probability distributions. Two different prices are defined for computation and communication, and it is shown that under mild assumptions they converge to zero as the quantization level and the number of agents tend to infinity. In addition, the main results are extended to the infinite-horizon discounted model and arbitrarily asymmetric cost function. Finally, a service-management example with 200 users is presented.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.