Paper detail

Deep searches for decameter wavelength pulsed emission from radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsars

We report the results of (a) extensive follow-up observations of the gamma-ray pulsar J1732-3131 that has been recently detected at decameter wavelengths, and (b) deep searches for counterparts of 9 other radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsars at 34 MHz, using the Gauribidanur radio telescope. No periodic signal from J1732-3131 could be detected above a detection threshold of $8σ$, even with an effective integration time of more than 40 hours. However, the average profile obtained by combining data from several epochs, at a dispersion measure of 15.44 pc/cc, is found to be consistent with that from the earlier detection of this pulsar at a confidence level of 99.2 %. We present this consistency between the two profiles as an evidence that J1732-3131 is a faint radio pulsar with an average flux density of 200--400 mJy at 34 MHz. Detection sensitivity of our deep searches, despite the extremely bright sky background at such low frequencies, is generally comparable to that of higher frequency searches for these pulsars, when scaled using reasonable assumptions about the underlying pulsar spectrum. We provide details of our deep searches, and put stringent upper limits on the decameter wavelength flux densities of several radio-quiet gamma-ray pulsars.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.