Paper detail

Deep radio observation of the gravitational lens candidate QSO2345+007

The double QSO2345+007 comprises two optical components separated by 7.1\ arcseconds and is the most prominent `dark matter' gravitational lens candidate. Despite being known for more than a decade, optical spectroscopy and imaging have been unable to determine whether this double QSO is a binary QSO or a gravitational lens system. In this note we report a deep VLA observation of this system, yielding a map with a noise level of 8.5\ts $μ$Jy per beam. We have a $4σ$ detection of a radio source within one arcsecond of the optical position of the brighter A-component of the QSO, but no significant detection of any radio counterpart of the B component. Given that the flux ratio in the optical waveband is $\sim$3--4, the gravitational lens hypothesis for this system would predict a radio flux of image B of $\lesssim 10$\ts $μ$Jy. The non-detection of the B component is thus consistent with, but does not prove, the lens interpretation.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.