Paper detail

Deep Learning Unresolved Lensed Lightcurves

Gravitationally lensed sources may have unresolved or blended multiple images, and for time varying sources the lightcurves from individual images can overlap. We use convolutional neural nets to both classify the lightcurves as due to unlensed, double, or quad lensed sources and fit for the time delays. Focusing on lensed supernova systems with time delays $Δt\gtrsim6$ days, we achieve 100\% precision and recall in identifying the number of images and then estimating the time delays to $σ_{Δt}\approx1$ day, with a $1000\times$ speedup relative to our previous Monte Carlo technique. This also succeeds for flux noise levels $\sim10\%$. For $Δt\in[2,6]$ days we obtain 94--98\% accuracy, depending on image configuration. We also explore using partial lightcurves where observations only start near maximum light, without the rise time data, and quantify the success.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.