Paper detail

Deep Learning nearby galaxy peculiar velocities

We explore how information in images of nearby galaxies can be used to estimate their distance. We train a convolutional Neural Network (NN) to do this, using galaxy images from the Illustris simulation. We show that if the NN is trained on data with random errors added to the true distance (representing training using spectroscopic redshift instead of actual distance), then the NN can predict distances in a test dataset with greater accuracy than it was given in the training set. This is not unusual, as often NNs are trained on data with added noise, in order to increase robustness. In this case, however, it offers a route to estimating peculiar velocities of nearby galaxies. Given a galaxy with a known spectroscopic redshift one can use the NN-predicted distance to make an estimate of the peculiar velocity. Trying this using relatively low resolution (1.4 arcsec per pixel) simulated galaxy images we find fractional RMS distance errors of 7.7% for galaxies at a mean distance of 75 Mpc from the observer, leading to RMS peculiar velocity errors of 440 km/s. In a companion paper we apply the technique to 145,115 nearby galaxies from the NASA Sloan Atlas.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.