Paper detail

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Peritoneal Cancer Index Regions from CT Imaging

Peritoneal metastases are currently assessed using diagnostic laparoscopy to determine Sugarbaker's Peritoneal Cancer Index (sPCI), which works by dividing the abdomen into 13 regions and scoring each region based on tumor size. A recent consensus study defined 3D regions to facilitate a radiological PCI (rPCI), providing standardized anatomical regions for imaging-based assessment. Despite its clinical value, sPCI is invasive and lacks a standardized imaging counterpart. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach to automatically segment the rPCI regions on CT. We evaluate nnU-Net and Swin UNETR on 62 CT scans with rPCI regions manually annotated by three clinical researchers and validated by two expert radiologists. Performance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation with the Dice Similarity Coefficient (Dice), 95th percentile Hausdorff distance and Average Surface Distance. nnU-Net achieved an overall Dice of 0.82, approaching interobserver agreement (0.88) and outperforming Swin UNETR (0.76), with remaining challenges primarily in right flank and small-bowel regions. These results demonstrate feasibility of automated rPCI segmentation, laying the foundation for non-invasive, imaging-based assessment.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.