Paper detail

Deep learning achieves perfect anomaly detection on 108,308 retinal images including unlearned diseases

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scanning is useful in detecting various retinal diseases. However, there are not enough ophthalmologists who can diagnose retinal OCT images in much of the world. To provide OCT screening inexpensively and extensively, an automated diagnosis system is indispensable. Although many machine learning techniques have been presented for assisting ophthalmologists in diagnosing retinal OCT images, there is no technique that can diagnose independently without relying on an ophthalmologist, i.e., there is no technique that does not overlook any anomaly, including unlearned diseases. As long as there is a risk of overlooking a disease with a technique, ophthalmologists must double-check even those images that the technique classifies as normal. Here, we show that our deep-learning-based binary classifier (normal or abnormal) achieved a perfect classification on 108,308 two-dimensional retinal OCT images, i.e., true positive rate = 1.000000 and true negative rate = 1.000000; hence, the area under the ROC curve = 1.0000000. Although the test set included three types of diseases, two of these were not used for training. However, all test images were correctly classified. Furthermore, we demonstrated that our scheme was able to cope with differences in patient race. No conventional approach has achieved the above performances. Our work has a sufficient possibility of raising automated diagnosis techniques for retinal OCT images from "assistant for ophthalmologists" to "independent diagnosis system without ophthalmologists".

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.