Paper detail

Deep Infrared ZAMS Fits to Benchmark Open Clusters Hosting delta Scuti Stars

This research aims to secure precise distances for cluster delta Scutis in order to investigate their properties via a VI Wesenheit framework. Deep JHKs colour-colour and ZAMS relations derived from ~700 unreddened stars featuring 2MASS photometry and precise HIP parallaxes (d<~25 pc) are applied to establish distances to several benchmark open clusters that host delta Scutis: Hyades, Pleiades, Praesepe, alpha Per, and M67 (d=47+-2,138+-6,183+-8,171+-8,815+-40 pc). That analysis provided constraints on the delta Sct sample's absolute Wesenheit magnitudes (W_VI,0), evolutionary status, and pulsation modes (order, n). The reliability of JHKs established cluster parameters is demonstrated via a comparison with van Leeuwen 2009 revised HIP results. Distances for 7 of 9 nearby (d<250 pc) clusters agree, and the discrepant cases (Pleiades & Blanco 1) are unrelated to (insignificant) Te/J-Ks variations with cluster age or [Fe/H]. JHKs photometry is tabulated for ~3x10^3 probable cluster members on the basis of proper motions (NOMAD). The deep JHKs photometry extends into the low mass regime (~0.4 Msun) and ensures precise (<5%) ZAMS fits. Pulsation modes inferred for the cluster delta Scutis from VI Wesenheit and independent analyses are comparable (+-n), and the methods are consistent in identifying higher order pulsators. Most small-amplitude cluster delta Scutis lie on VI Wesenheit loci characterizing n>~1 pulsators. A distance established to NGC 1817 from delta Scutis (d~1.7 kpc) via a universal VI Wesenheit template agrees with estimates in the literature, assuming the variables delineate the n>~1 boundary. Small statistics in tandem with other factors presently encumber the use of mmag delta Scutis as viable distance indicators to intermediate-age open clusters, yet a VI Wesenheit approach is a pertinent means for studying delta Scutis in harmony with other methods.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.