Paper detail

Deep Absorption Line Studies of Quiescent Galaxies at z~2: The Dynamical Mass-Size Relation, and First Constraints on the Fundamental plane

We present dynamical and structural scaling relations of quiescent galaxies at z=2, including the dynamical mass-size relation and the first constraints on the fundamental plane (FP). The backbone of the analysis is a new, very deep VLT/X-shooter spectrum of a massive, compact, quiescent galaxy at z=2.0389. We detect the continuum between 3700-22000A and several strong absorption features (Balmer series, Ca H+K, G-band), from which we derive a stellar velocity dispersion of 318 +/- 53 km/s. We perform detailed modeling of the continuum emission and line indices and derive strong simultaneous constraints on the age, metallicity, and stellar mass. The galaxy is a dusty (A_V=0.77 (+0.36,-0.32)) solar metallicity (log(Z/Zsun) = 0.02 (+0.20,-0.41)) post starburst galaxy, with a mean luminosity weighted log(age/yr) of 8.9 +/- 0.1. The galaxy formed the majority of its stars at z>3 and currently has little or no ongoing star formation. We compile a sample of three other z~2 quiescent galaxies with measured velocity dispersions, two of which are also post starburst like. Their dynamical mass-size relation is offset significantly less than the stellar mass-size relation from the local early type relations, which we attribute to a lower central dark matter fraction. Recent cosmological merger simulations qualitatively agree with the data, but can not fully account for the evolution in the dark matter fraction. The z~2 FP requires additional evolution beyond passive stellar aging, to be in agreement with the local FP. The structural evolution predicted by the cosmological simulations is insufficient, suggesting that additional, possibly non-homologous structural evolution is needed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.