Paper detail

Deduction of $M(Sigma pi)$ for $Lambda(1405)$ with mixed $T_{ Sigma pi leftarrow K^-p} and T_{ Sigma pi leftarrow Sigmapi}$ from Hemingway's data

We formulated the $Lambda(1405)$ (abbreviated as $Lambda^*$) $rightarrow (Sigmapi)^0$ invariant-mass spectra produced in the $K^- + p rightarrow Sigma^+ (1660) + pi^-$, followed by $Sigma^+ (1660) rightarrow Lambda(1405) + pi^+ rightarrow Sigmapi + pi^+$, processes at $p(K^-) = 4.2$ GeV/$c$, in which both the incident channel for a quasi-bound $K^-p$ state and its decay process to $(Sigma pi)^0$ were taken into account realistically. We calculated $M(Sigma pi)$ spectral shapes using mixed transition matrices, $T_{21} = T_{ Sigmapi leftarrow K^-p}$ and $T_{22} = T_{ Sigma pi leftarrow Sigma pi}$, for various theoretical models involving $Lambda^*$. The asymmetric spectra were compared to old experimental data of Hemingway, and it was found that the mixing of the two channels, written as $(1-f) , T_{21} + f, T_{22}$, gave a better result than considering the individual channels, yielding $f = 0.376_{-0.019}^{+0.021}$, $M(Lambda^*) = 1406.6_{-3.3}^{+3.4}$ MeV/$c^2$ and $Gamma = 70 pm 2$ MeV, nearly consistent with the 2014 PDG values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.