Paper detail

Dedekind completions, neat embeddings and omitting types

Let n be finite >2. We show that any class between S\Nr_n\CA_{n+3} and RCA_n is not atom canonical, and any class containing the class of completely representable algebras and contained in S_c\Nr_n\CA_{n+3} is not elementary. We show that there is no finite variable universal axiomatization of many diagonal free reducts of representable cylindric algebras of dimension n, like the varieties of representable diagonal-free cylindric algebras and Halmos' polyadic algebras (without equality). We apply our hitherto obtained algebraic results to show that the omitting types theorem fails for finite variable fragments of first order logic with and without equality, having n variables, even if we count in severely relativized models as candidates for omitting single non-principle types. Finally, we show that for many cylindric-like algebras, like diagonal free cylindric algebras and Halmos' polyadic algebras with and without equality the class of strongly representable atom structures of finite dimension >2 is not elementary.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.