Paper detail

Decremental Matching in General Graphs

We consider the problem of maintaining an approximate maximum integral matching in a dynamic graph $G$, while the adversary makes changes to the edges of the graph. The goal is to maintain a $(1+ε)$-approximate maximum matching for constant $ε>0$, while minimizing the update time. In the fully dynamic setting, where both edge insertion and deletions are allowed, Gupta and Peng (see \cite{GP13}) gave an algorithm for this problem with an update time of $O(\sqrt{m}/ε^2)$. Motivated by the fact that the $O_ε(\sqrt{m})$ barrier is hard to overcome (see Henzinger, Krinninger, Nanongkai, and Saranurak [HKNS15]); Kopelowitz, Pettie, and Porat [KPP16]), we study this problem in the \emph{decremental} model, where the adversary is only allowed to delete edges. Recently, Bernstein, Probst-Gutenberg, and Saranurak (see [BPT20]) gave an $O_ε(1)$ update time decremental algorithm for this problem in \emph{bipartite graphs}. However, beating $O(\sqrt{m})$ update time remained an open problem for \emph{general graphs}. In this paper, we bridge the gap between bipartite and general graphs, by giving an $O_ε(1)$ update time algorithm that maintains a $(1+ε)$-approximate maximum integral matching under adversarial deletions. Our algorithm is randomized, but works against an adaptive adversary. Together with the work of Grandoni, Leonardi, Sankowski, Schwiegelshohn, and Solomon [GLSSS19] who give an $O_ε(1)$ update time algorithm for general graphs in the \emph{incremental} (insertion-only) model, our result essentially completes the picture for partially dynamic matching.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.