Paper detail

Decrease in the Brightness of the Cosmic X-ray and Soft Gamma-ray Background toward Clusters of Galaxies

We show that Compton scattering by electrons of the hot intergalactic gas in galaxy clusters should lead to peculiar distortions of the cosmic background X-ray and soft gamma-ray radiation - an increase in its brightness at E<60-100 keV and a drop at higher energies. The distortions allow the most important cluster parameters to be measured. The spectral shape of the distortions and its dependence on the gas temperature, optical depth, and surface density distribution law have been studied using Monte Carlo computations and confirmed by analytical estimations. In the cluster frame the maximum of the background decrease due to the recoil effect occurs at ~500-600 keV. The photoionization of H- and He-like iron and nickel ions leads to additional distortions in the background spectrum - a strong absorption line with the threshold at ~9 keV (and also to an absorption jump at ~2 keV for cold clusters). The absorption of intrinsic thermal radiation from the cluster gas by these ions also leads to such lines. In nearby (z<1) clusters the line at ~2 keV is noticeably enhanced by absorption in the colder (~10^6 K) plasma of their peripheral (~3 Mpc) regions; moreover, the absorption line at ~1.3 keV splits off from it. The redshift of distant clusters shifts the absorption lines in the background spectrum (at ~2, ~9, and ~500 keV) to lower energies. Thus, in contrast to the microwave background scattering effect, this effect depends on the cluster redshift z, but in a very peculiar way. When observing clusters at z>1, the effect allows one to determine how the X-ray background evolved and how it was &#34;gathered&#34; with z. To detect the effect, the accuracy of measurements should reach ~0.1%. We consider the most promising clusters for observing the effect and discuss the techniques whereby the influence of the thermal gas radiation hindering the detection of background distortions should be minimal.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.