Paper detail

Deconstructing the Planck TT Power Spectrum to Constrain Deviations from $Λ$CDM

Consistency checks of $Λ$CDM predictions with current cosmological data sets may illuminate the types of changes needed to resolve cosmological tensions. To this end, we modify the CLASS Boltzmann code to create phenomenological amplitudes, similar to the lensing amplitude parameter $A_L$, for the Sachs-Wolfe, Doppler, early Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (eISW), and Polarization contributions to the CMB temperature anisotropy, and then we include these additional amplitudes in fits to the Planck TT power spectrum. We find that allowing one of these amplitudes to vary at a time results in little improvement over $Λ$CDM alone suggesting that each of these physical effects are being correctly accounted for given the current level of precision. Further, we find that the only pair of phenomenological amplitudes that results in a significant improvement to the fit to Planck temperature data results from varying the amplitudes of the Sachs-Wolfe and Doppler effects simultaneously. However, we show that this model is really just refinding the $Λ$CDM + $A_L$ solution. We test adding our phenomenological amplitudes as well as $N_{\textrm{eff}}$, $Y_{\textrm{He}}$, and $n_{\textrm{run}}$ to $Λ$CDM + $A_L$ and find that none of these model extensions provide significant improvement over $Λ$CDM + $A_L$ when fitting Planck temperature data. Finally, we quantify the contributions of both the eISW effect and lensing on the constraint of the physical matter density from Planck temperature data by allowing the phenomenological amplitude from each effect to vary. We find that these effects play a relatively small role (the uncertainty increases by $3.5\%$ and $16\%$ respectively) suggesting that the overall photon envelope has the greatest constraining power.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.