Paper detail

Decomposition of total stress-energy for the generalised Kiselev black hole

We demonstrate that the anisotropic stress-energy supporting the Kiselev black hole can be mimicked by being split into a perfect fluid component plus either an electromagnetic component or a scalar field component, thereby quantifying the precise extent to which the Kiselev black hole fails to represent a perfect fluid spacetime. The perfect fluid component carries either an electric or a scalar charge, which then generates anisotropic electromagnetic or scalar fields. This in turn generates anisotropic contributions to the stress-energy. These in turn induce forces which partially (in addition to the fluid pressure gradient) support the matter content against gravity. This decomposition is carried out both for the original 1-component Kiselev black hole and for the generalized N-component Kiselev black holes. We also comment on the presence of energy condition violations (specifically for the null energy condition --- NEC) for certain sub-classes of Kiselev black holes.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.