Paper detail

Decomposition of the rank 3 Kac-Moody Lie algebra $F$ with respect to the rank 2 hyperbolic subalgebra $Fib$

In 1983 Feingold-Frenkel studied the structure of a rank 3 hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra $\mathcal{F}$ containing the affine KM algebra $A^{(1)}_1$. In 2004 Feingold-Nicolai showed that $\mathcal{F}$ contains all rank 2 hyperbolic KM algebras with symmetric Cartan matrices, $A=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 2 & -a \\ -a & 2 \\ \end{array}\right], a\geq 3$. The case when $a=3$ is called $\mathcal{F}ib$ because of its connection with the Fibonacci numbers (Feingold 1980). Some important structural results about $\mathcal{F}$ come from the decomposition with respect to its affine subalgebra $A^{(1)}_1$. Here we study the decomposition of $\mathcal{F}$ with respect to its subalgebra $\mathcal{F}ib$. We find that $\mathcal{F}$ has a grading by $\mathcal{F}ib$-level, and prove that each graded piece, $\mathcal{F}ib(m)$ for $m\in\mathbb{Z}$, is an integrable $\mathcal{F}ib$-module. We show that for $|m|>2$, $\mathcal{F}ib(m)$ completely reduces as a direct sum of highest- and lowest-weight modules, and for $|m|\leq 2$, $\mathcal{F}ib(m)$ contains one irreducible non-standard quotient module $V^{Λ_m}=V(m)\Big/U(m)$. We then prove that the quotient $\mathcal{F}ib(m)\Big/V(m)$ completely reduces as a direct sum of one trivial module (on level 0), and standard modules. We give an algorithm for determining the inner multiplicities of any irreducible $\mathcal{F}ib$-module, in particular the non-standard modules on levels $|m|\leq 2$. We show that multiplicities of non-standard modules on levels $|m|=1,2$ do not follow the Kac-Peterson recursion, but instead appear to follow a recursion similar to Racah-Speiser. We then use results of Borcherds and Frenkel-Lepowsky-Meurman and construct vertex algebras from the root lattices of $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}ib$, and study the decomposition within this setting.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.