Paper detail

Decomposition and parity of p-adic representations attached to algebraic automorphic forms on GL(4)

Let F be a number field with adele ring A_F, and πan isobaric, algebraic automorphic representation of GL_4(A_F) of a fixed archimedean weight, which is quasi-regular, meaning that at every archimedean place v of F, the 4-dimensional representation σ_v of the Weil group W_{F_v} attached to π_v is multiplicity free. Suppose there is an associated 4-dimensional, Hodge-Tate p-adic representation ρof the absolute Galois group G_F, whose local L-factors agree with those of π(up to a shift) at almost all primes P of F. Then our first result is that the semisimplification of ρdoes not contain any irreducible 2-dimensional Galois representation which is even. The second result is that if πis regular and ρcrystalline, then for sufficiently large p (see the article for a precise statement), the decomposition type of ρis the same as the isobaric type of π. A consequence is that ρis irreducible when πis cuspidal (and regular algebraic), which has also been proved by F. Calegari and T. Gee, in fact with no hypothesis on p. The third and final result, using Taylor's potential modularity theorem, is that given a pair (σ, σ') of odd, 2-dimensional p-adic representations of the same weight and distinct Hodge-Tate types, such that their direct sum is automorphic, the dimension of the G_F-invariants of the tensor product ηof the dual of σwith σ' equals, for large p, the order of pole at s=1 of the L-function of η(with the bad factors removed). This is as predicted by the Tate conjecture when σ, σ' occur in p-adic etale cohmology of smooth projective varieties over F, and it also provides a useful link to a small piece of the work of C. Skinner and E. Urban.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.