Paper detail

Decomposition algorithms for globally solving mathematical programs with affine equilibrium constraints

A mathematical programming problem with affine equilibrium constraints (AMPEC) is a bilevel programming problem where the lower one is a parametric affine variational inequality. We formulate some classes of bilevel programming in forms of MPEC. Then we use a regularization technique to formulate the resulting problem as a mathematical program with an additional constraint defined by the difference of two convex functions (DC function). A main feature of this DC decomposition is that the second component depends upon only the parameter in the lower problem. This property allows us to develop branch-and-bound algorithms for globally solving AMPEC where the adaptive rectangular bisection takes place only in the space of the parameter. As an example, we use the proposed algorithm to solve a bilevel Nash-Cournot equilibrium market model. Computational results show the efficiency of the proposed algorithm.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.