Paper detail

Decomposing graphs into a constant number of locally irregular subgraphs

A graph is locally irregular if no two adjacent vertices have the same degree. The irregular chromatic index $χ_{\rm irr}'(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of locally irregular subgraphs needed to edge-decompose $G$. Not all graphs have such a decomposition, but Baudon, Bensmail, Przybyło, and Woźniak conjectured that if $G$ can be decomposed into locally irregular subgraphs, then $χ_{\rm irr}'(G)\leq 3$. In support of this conjecture, Przybyło showed that $χ_{\rm irr}'(G)\leq 3$ holds whenever $G$ has minimum degree at least $10^{10}$. Here we prove that every bipartite graph $G$ which is not an odd length path satisfies $χ_{\rm irr}'(G)\leq 10$. This is the first general constant upper bound on the irregular chromatic index of bipartite graphs. Combining this result with Przybyło's result, we show that $χ_{\rm irr}'(G) \leq 328$ for every graph $G$ which admits a decomposition into locally irregular subgraphs. Finally, we show that $χ_{\rm irr}'(G)\leq 2$ for every $16$-edge-connected bipartite graph $G$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.