Paper detail

Decoding the QCD critical behaviour in A+A collisions

In a systematic search for the QCD critical point in nuclear collisions, at the CERN SPS, it was found that intermittency measurements in the freeze-out state of central Si+Si collisions, at the maximum SPS energy, provide us with an indication of sizeable critical fluctuations. Also, rather recently, a weaker effect was traced in preliminary data of the Ar+Sc reaction for 10-20% most central collisions at (approximately) the same energy. However, the uncertainties in the analysis and the limitations of the experimental event statistics make the interpretation of the above measurements (NA49, NA61/SHINE) rather inconclusive, inviting for a further, phenomenological investigation with complementary tools and theoretical ideas. To this end, in the present work, we employ intermittency techniques within a model-independent analysis scheme (AMIAS), a novel method from Data Science [arXiv:1205.6505], in order to produce unbiased results for the parameters of the power-laws and in particular for the associated power-law exponent (intermittency index) $ϕ_2$. Using data-sets at different peripheralities, we also study the dependence of the $ϕ_2$-value on the number of wounded nucleons, in order to uncover the approach to the critical point. With these findings and the help of Ising-QCD partition function, the interpretation of SPS intermittency measurements and their links to the critical region, are discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.