Paper detail

Decoding Dark Matter at future $e^+ e^-$ colliders

We explore the potential of the $e^+ e^-$ colliders to discover dark matter and determine its properties such as mass and the spin. For this purpose we study spin zero and spin one-half cases of dark matter, $D$ which belongs to $SU(2)$ weak doublet and therefore has the charged doublet partner, $D^+$. For the case of scalar dark matter we chose Inert Doublet Model, while for the case of fermion dark matter we suggest the new minimal fermion dark matter model with only three parameters. We choose two benchmarks for the models under study which provide the correct amount of observed DM relic density and consistent with the current DM searches. We focus on the particular process $e^+ e^- \to D^+ D^- \to D D W^+ W^- \to DD(q \bar{q})(μ^\pmν)$ at 500 GeV ILC collider which gives rise to the "di-jet +$μ$ + missing $E_T$" signature and study it at the level of fast detector simulation, taking into account Bremsstrahlung and ISR effects. We have found that two kinematical observables -- the energy of the muon, $E_μ$, and the angular distribution of $W$-boson, reconstructed from di-jet, $\cosθ_{jj}$ are very powerful in determination of DM mass and spin, respectively. In particular we have demonstrated that in case of fermion DM, the masses can be measured with a few percent accuracy already at 500 fb$^{-1}$ integrated luminosity. At the same time, the scalar DM model which has about an order of magnitude lower signal, requires about factor of 40 higher luminosity to reach the same accuracy in the mass measurement. We have found that one can distinguish fermion and scalar DM scenarios with about 2 ab$^{-1}$ total integrated luminosity or less without using the information on the cross sections for benchmarks under study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.