Paper detail

Decision Programming for optimizing the Finnish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

In Finland colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates have steadily increased over the last decades and as of 2017, CRC is the sixth most common cause of death. CRC is a crucial concern for the public health of Finland. We optimize the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) cut-off level for specified target populations with regard to minimization of cancer prevalence with Decision Programming, which is a novel approach to solving discrete multi-stage decision problems under uncertainty. The results present optimal cut-off levels for Finnish target groups with different colonoscopy capacity constraints. Finally, the estimated resulting cancer prevalence, the amount of required colonoscopies and third-party payer costs resulting from found strategies to the newly implemented Finnish CRC Screening Programme, which have not previously been published, are presented.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.