Paper detail

Decimation limits of principal algebraic $\mathbb{Z}^d$-actions

Let $f$ be a Laurent polynomial in $d$ commuting variables with integer coefficients. Associated to $f$ is the principal algebraic $\mathbb{Z}^d$-action $α_f$ on a compact subgroup $X_f$ of $\mathbb{T}^{\mathbb{Z}^d}$ determined by $f$. Let $N\ge1$ and restrict points in $X_f$ to coordinates in $N\mathbb{Z}^d$. The resulting algebraic $N\mathbb{Z}^d$-action is again principal, and is associated to a polynomial $g_N$ whose support grows with $N$ and whose coefficients grow exponentially with $N$. We prove that by suitably renormalizing these decimations we can identify a limiting behavior given by a continuous concave function on the Newton polytope of $f$, and show that this decimation limit is the negative of the Legendre dual of the Ronkin function of $f$. In certain cases with two variables, the decimation limit coincides with the surface tension of random surfaces related to dimer models, but the statistical physics methods used to prove this are quite different and depend on special properties of the polynomial.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.