Paper detail

Deciding reducibility of mapping classes is in $\textbf{NP}$

For a fixed marked surface $S$, we show that the problem of deciding whether or not a mapping class is reducible lies in $\textbf{NP}$. As usual this immediately gives an exponential time algorithm to decide whether or not a mapping class is reducible. To do this we use an (ideal) triangulation to obtain a coordinate system on the set of multicurves on $S$. The result then follows from the fact that the action of the mapping class group of $S$ is piecewise-linear with respect to such a coordinate system and so we are able so show that: if a mapping class $h$ fixes a multicurve then it fixes one whose size is at most exponential in the word length of $h$. We go on to show how to repeat this construction on invariant subsurfaces. This allows us to show that a similar bound holds for the size of the canonical curve system of a mapping class and so give an alternate, elementary proof of a result of Koberda and Mangahas.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.