Paper detail

Deciding Graph non-Hamiltonicity via a Closure Algorithm

We present a matching and LP based heuristic algorithm that decides graph non-Hamiltonicity. Each of the $n!$ Hamilton cycles in a complete directed graph on $n+1$ vertices corresponds with each of the $n!$ $n$-permutation matrices $P$, such that $p_{u,i}=1$ if and only if the $i^{th}$ arc in a cycle enters vertex $u$, starting and ending at vertex $n+1$. A graph instance ($G$) is initially coded as exclusion set $E$, whose members are pairs of components of $P$, $\{p_{u,i} ,p_{v,i+1}\}, i=1,n-1$, for each arc $(u,v)$ not in $G$. For each $\{p_{u,i} ,p_{v,i+1}\}\in E$, the set of $P$ satisfying $p_{u,i}=p_{v,i+1}=1$ correspond with a set of cycles not in $G$. Accounting for all arcs not in $G$, $E$ codes precisely the set of cycles not in $G$. A doubly stochastic-like $\mathcal{O}$($n^4$) formulation of the Hamilton cycle decision problem is then constructed. Each $\{p_{u,i} ,p_{v,j}\}$ is coded as variable $q_{u,i,v,j}$ such that the set of integer extrema is the set of all permutations. We model $G$ by setting each $q_{u,i,v,j}=0$ in correspondence with each $\{p_{u,i} ,p_{v,j}\}\in E$ such that for non-Hamiltonian $G$, integer solutions cannot exist. We recognize non-Hamiltonicity by iteratively deducing additional $q_{u,i,v,j}$ that can be set zero and expanding $E$ until the formulation becomes infeasible, in which case we recognize that no integer solutions exists i.e. $G$ is decided non-Hamiltonian. Over 100 non-Hamiltonian graphs (10 through 104 vertices) and 2000 randomized 31 vertex non-Hamiltonian graphs are tested and correctly decided non-Hamiltonian. For Hamiltonian $G$, the complement of $E$ provides information about covers of matchings, perhaps useful in searching for cycles. We also present an example where the algorithm fails to deduce any integral value for any $q_{u,i,v,j}$ i.e. $G$ is undecided.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.