Paper detail

Decidability and Periodicity of Low Complexity Tilings

In this paper we study colorings (or tilings) of the two-dimensional grid $\mathbb{Z}^2$. A coloring is said to be valid with respect to a set $P$ of $n\times m$ rectangular patterns if all $n\times m$ sub-patterns of the coloring are in $P$. A coloring $c$ is said to be of low complexity with respect to a rectangle if there exist $m,n\in\mathbb{N}$ and a set $P$ of $n\times m$ rectangular patterns such that $c$ is valid with respect to $P$ and $|P|\leq nm$. Open since it was stated in 1997, Nivat's conjecture states that such a coloring is necessarily periodic. If Nivat's conjecture is true, all valid colorings with respect to $P$ such that $|P|\leq mn$ must be periodic. We prove that there exists at least one periodic coloring among the valid ones. We use this result to investigate the tiling problem, also known as the domino problem, which is well known to be undecidable in its full generality. However, we show that it is decidable in the low-complexity setting. Then, we use our result to show that Nivat's conjecture holds for uniformly recurrent configurations. These results also extend to other convex shapes in place of the rectangle.\\ After that, we prove that the $nm$ bound is multiplicatively optimal for the decidability of the domino problem, as for all $\varepsilon>0$ it is undecidable to determine if there exists a valid coloring for a given $m,n\in \mathbb{N}$ and set of rectangular patterns $P$ of size $n\times m$ such that $|P|\leq (1+\varepsilon)nm$. We prove a slightly better bound in the case where $m=n$, as well as constructing aperiodic SFTs of pretty low complexity.\\ This paper is an extended version of a paper published in STACS 2020.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.