Paper detail

Decentralized Formation Control Part I: Geometric Aspects

In this paper, we develop new methods for the analysis of decentralized control systems and we apply them to formation control problems. The basic set-up consists of a system with multiple agents corresponding to the nodes of a graph whose edges encode the information that is available to the agents. We address the question of whether the information flow defined by the graph is sufficient for the agents to accomplish a given task. Formation control is concerned with problems in which agents are required to stabilize at a given distance from other agents. In this context, the graph of a formation encodes both the information flow and the distance constraints, by fixing the lengths of the edges. A formation is said to be rigid if it cannot be continuously deformed with the distance constraints satisfied; a formation is minimally rigid if no distance constraint can be omitted without the formation losing its rigidity. Hence, the graph underlying minimally rigid formation provides just enough constraints to yield a rigid formation. An open question we will settle is whether the information flow afforded by a minimally rigid graph is sufficient to insure global stability. We show that the answer is negative in the case of directed information flow. In this first part, we establish basic properties of formation control in the plane. Formations and the associated control problems are defined modulo rigid transformations. This fact has strong implications on the geometry of the space of formations and on the feedback laws, since they need to respect this invariance. We study both aspects here. We show that the space of frameworks of n agents is CP(n-2) x (0,\infty). We then illustrate how the non-trivial topology of this space relates to the parametrization of the formation by inter-agent distances.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.