Paper detail

Decaying turbulence for the fractional subcritical Burgers equation

We consider the fractional unforced Burgers equation in the one-dimensional space-periodic setting: $$\partial u/\partial t+(f(u))_x +νΛ^α u= 0, t \geq 0,\ \mathbb{x} \in \mathbb{T}^d=(\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z})^d.$$ Here $f$ is strongly convex and satisfies an additional growth condition, $Λ=\sqrt{-Δ}$, $ν$ is small and positive, while $α\in (1,\ 2)$ is a constant in the subcritical range. For solutions $u$ of this equation, we generalise the results obtained for the case $α=2$ (i.e. when $-Λ^α$ is the Laplacian) in [10]. We obtain sharp estimates for the time-averaged Sobolev norms of $u$ as a function of $ν$. These results yield sharp estimates for natural analogues of quantities characterising the hydrodynamical turbulence, namely the averages of the increments and of the energy spectrum. In the inertial range, these quantities behave as a power of the norm of the relevant parameter, which is respectively the separation $\ell$ in the physical space and the wavenumber $\mathbf{k}$ in the Fourier space. The form of all estimates is the same as in the case $α=2$; the only thing that changes (except implicit constants) is that $ν$ is replaced by $ν^{1/(α-1)}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.