Paper detail

Decaying dark matter mimicking time-varying dark energy

A $Λ$CDM model with dark matter that decays into inert relativistic energy on a timescale longer than the Hubble time will produce an expansion history that can be misinterpreted as stable dark matter with time-varying dark energy. We calculate the corresponding spurious equation of state parameter, $\widetilde w_ϕ$, as a function of redshift, and show that the evolution of $\widetilde w_ϕ$ depends strongly on the assumed value of the dark matter density, erroneously taken to scale as $a^{-3}$. Depending on the latter, one can obtain models that mimic quintessence ($\widetilde w_ϕ> -1$), phantom models ($\widetilde w_ϕ< -1$) or models in which the equation of state parameter crosses the phantom divide, evolving from $\widetilde w_ϕ> -1$ at high redshift to $\widetilde w_ϕ< -1$ at low redshift. All of these models generically converge toward $\widetilde w_ϕ\approx -1$ at the present. The degeneracy between the $Λ$CDM model with decaying dark matter and the corresponding spurious quintessence model is broken by the growth of density perturbations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.