Paper detail

Decay of the solution to the bipolar Euler-Poisson system with damping in $\mathbb{R}^3$

We construct the global solution to the Cauchy&#39;s problem of the bipolar Euler-Poisson equations with damping in $\mathbb{R}^3$ when $H^3$ norm of the initial data is small. If further, the $\dot{H}^{-s}$ norm ($0\leq s<3/2)$ or $\dot{B}_{2,\infty}^{-s}$ norm ($0<s\leq3/2$) of the initial data is bounded, we give the optimal decay rates of the solution. As a byproduct, the decay results of the $L^p-L^2$ ($1\leq p\leq2$) type hold without the smallness of the $L^p$ norm of the initial data. In particular, we deduce that $\|\nabla^k(ρ_1-ρ_2)\|_{L^2} \sim(1+t)^{-5/4-\frac{k}{2}}$ and $\|\nabla^k(ρ_i-\barρ,u_i,\nablaϕ)\|_{L^2} \sim(1+t)^{-3/4-\frac{k}{2}}$. We improve the decay results in Li and Yang \cite{Li3}(\emph{J.Differential Equations} 252(2012), 768-791), where they showed the decay rates as $\|\nabla^k(ρ_i-\barρ)\|_{L^2} \sim(1+t)^{-3/4-\frac{k}{2}}$ and $\|\nabla^k(u_i,\nablaϕ)\|_{L^2} \sim(1+t)^{-1/4-\frac{k}{2}}$, when the $H^3\cap L^1$ norm of the initial data is small. Our analysis is motivated by the technique developed recently in Guo and Wang \cite{Guo}(\emph{Comm. Partial Differential Equations} 37(2012), 2165-2208) with some modifications.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.